Update Authors list base on contributor stats.

[BigBlueHat]

Based on
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model-2.0-test-suite/graphs/contributors

[TallTed]

I was going to just say "lgtm", but I realized that the stats page counts commits.

Any given commit could include 1 or 1000 (or more) lines of source.

A one-commit user could "author" an entire document of 1000 lines, against which some enterprising reviewers could make 100 one-line PRs, or one 100-line PR against which some other(s) could make several 1-line change requests.

The sum total of these contributions could easily put the contributor of 100 one-line PRs ahead in the "commit" count — but they should not be ranked as more of an author than the original 1000-line committer who never added another.

It doesn't appear to me that GitHub statistics handle things in a useful fashion for this use.

[BigBlueHat]

It doesn't appear to me that GitHub statistics handle things in a useful fashion for this use.

Agreed. I didn't blindly list whomever was in the list. There were cases where I (for example) had added loads of content/commits to setup the OSS licensing...but made no real substantial "authoring" changes to the test suite code/material.

The lists I did post here are (afaict) accurately considerable as "authors" of the test suites. That said, I do need to add @Wind4Greg to some of the suites as his test vectors were used--even though he didn't make the commits.

@TallTed the goal of this was to make things more accurate from how they had been before (and to cite my source). It could certainly till use work, so if/when you see a need for other authors to be added, please feel free to send a PR!