LLM-powered code vulnerability triage
Today's security testing tools overwhelm developers with non-contextual alerts and false positives, making vulnerability management inefficient. As MITRE notes, developers face thousands of bug reports without clear prioritization guidance. OWASP confirms this limitation - static analysis tools can't understand application context, requiring significant manual effort to validate findings. We're solving this by combining traditional security tools with LLM agents that can understand context, prioritize real threats, and provide actionable security insights via a centralized dashboard.
About 50-80% of SAST findings are false positives. Our tool would reduce false positives by 40-60%, which translates to 15-20 hours per week for a security team of 5 people.
A security dashboard powered by AI agents that:
- Prioritizes real vulnerabilities over false positives
- Provides context-aware security analysis
- Maps findings to CVE and OWASP data
- Uses vector databases to enable AI comprehension of your codebase
- Combines SAST and SCA with intelligent triage
Throughout software development and QA
Flexible deployment options:
- Local environment via docker-compose
- CI/CD pipeline integration
- hosted service offering
Software developers, Product security teams, open source maintainers
Implementation approach:
- Integrates open source security tools (CodeQL, semgrep, OWASP Dependency Check, npm audit, PyPi Safety)
- Vector database integration for codebase analysis
- AI agents process tool outputs for intelligent vulnerability triage
graph TD
Start[Start Analysis] --> Discovery[Discovery Agent]
subgraph "Discovery Phase"
Discovery --> TechStack[Analyze Tech Stack]
Discovery --> Dependencies[Analyze Dependencies]
Discovery --> Structure[Analyze Project Structure]
Discovery --> TestCov[Analyze Test Coverage]
TechStack --> Context[Project Context]
Dependencies --> Context
Structure --> Context
TestCov --> Context
Context --> ThreatModel[Generate Threat Model]
Context --> TestPlan[Generate Test Plan]
end
subgraph "Vulnerability Analysis Phase"
TestPlan --> ToolSelect[Select Security Tools]
ToolSelect --> ParallelAnalysis[Run Parallel Analysis]
ParallelAnalysis --> CodeQL[CodeQL Analysis]
ParallelAnalysis --> Semgrep[Semgrep Analysis]
ParallelAnalysis --> DepCheck[Dependency Check]
ParallelAnalysis --> CustomTools[Other Tools...]
CodeQL --> Findings[Raw Findings]
Semgrep --> Findings
DepCheck --> Findings
CustomTools --> Findings
end
subgraph "Triage Phase"
Findings --> Triage[Triage Agent]
Context --> Triage
Triage --> DataFlow[Data Flow Analysis]
Triage --> PatternMatch[Pattern Matching]
Triage --> Sanitizers[Sanitizer Analysis]
DataFlow --> Scoring[Confidence Scoring]
PatternMatch --> Scoring
Sanitizers --> Scoring
Scoring --> FinalReport[Security Report]
end
FinalReport --> End[End Analysis]