-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Chore/remove test reporter duplicate #56739
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Review requested:
|
see #56468 (comment) |
cc @cjihrig |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #56739 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 89.21% 88.72% -0.49%
==========================================
Files 662 662
Lines 191968 191919 -49
Branches 36955 36599 -356
==========================================
- Hits 171269 170286 -983
- Misses 13535 14471 +936
+ Partials 7164 7162 -2 |
It looks like the CI is not happy yet. It looks like there is an extra or missing |
@cjihrig Based on the error there seems to be an extra one, probably the one defined below in the workflow files, just removed it |
Looking at the GitHub Actions output, I see two failures. One is #56768 and can be ignored. The other is the intentional failure from this PR:
This includes only the test title, location, and actual error as expected. Nice work. I'll kick off a Jenkins CI run to see how that looks. |
Cool! In the meantime, lmk if there's anything else I can help with |
It looks like this does not use the error only reporter properly in Jenkins:
I think we should land this change and address Jenkins in a followup (unless you want to try getting Jenkins fixed up here). |
FWIW, I believe this "stack trace" view is the biggest problem: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit-linuxone/47790/nodes=rhel9-s390x/testReport/junit/(root)/parallel/test_assert_fail/
This should be addressed by getting the correct reporter in place though. |
I'm okay with landing this and following up with a new one. Should I remove the failing test, then? |
Yea, if you want to get this landed now, please remove the failing test. |
2d22b64
to
9fc6be1
Compare
Done! |
Currently the test reporter is specified both in workflow files and
test.py
. This PR removes it from the formers to avoid duplication