Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Survey of upstream package usage in prep for SciML #198

Open
4 of 13 tasks
jlperla opened this issue Dec 22, 2022 · 0 comments
Open
4 of 13 tasks

Survey of upstream package usage in prep for SciML #198

jlperla opened this issue Dec 22, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@jlperla
Copy link
Member

jlperla commented Dec 22, 2022

To lower maintenance requirements and upstream dependencies, we should verify:

  • QuantEcon.jl See separate issue for details
  • VegaLite and Query - reference ecosystem instead?
  • Do we want to avoid having Zygote directly in the docs and instead just refer to it until reverse-mode AD consolidates a little? Point to Enzyme as well?
  • DataInterpolations.jl and Interpolations.jl vs. whatever sciml has in the spring?

Key sciml packages as they currently are specified:

Also, in anticipation of #56 and others we should review the optimization and related sciml packages to see what is required for direct use, can be consolidated, etc.

  • BlackBoxOptim.jl
  • Optim.jl
  • NLopt
  • LeastSquaresOptim
  • Ipopt
  • NLSolve and Roots replaced with sciml's nonlinear solver
  • IterativeSolvers/LinerOperators/LinearMaps/etc. and preconditioners with sciml's linear solver interface which might consolidate options?
  • DiffEqOperators is being replaced with scimloperators/MOL/etc.
  • Expectations.jl vs FastGaussQuadrature etc. usage. What about sciml's integrals.jl? Is gaussian quadrature in scope?
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant