Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Clarify spec for subpath #379

Open
johnmhoran opened this issue Jan 21, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

Clarify spec for subpath #379

johnmhoran opened this issue Jan 21, 2025 · 1 comment
Assignees
@jkowalleck
Labels
Ecma

Comments

@johnmhoran
Copy link
Member

johnmhoran: 2025-01-20 18:39: Just started to flesh out the relevant issues, PRs and comments before converting this to an issue.

Relevant issues and PRs:

We also need to

  • review the relevant language etc. in PURL-SPECIFICATION.rst
  • apply RFC 2119/8174 but replace the use of any "not"/"NOT" with affirmative language
@johnmhoran johnmhoran converted this from a draft issue Jan 21, 2025
@johnmhoran johnmhoran moved this from In Progress to Todo in Core PURL spec Jan 21, 2025
@jkowalleck jkowalleck moved this from Todo to In Progress in Core PURL spec Jan 22, 2025
@jkowalleck
Copy link
Member

jkowalleck commented Jan 22, 2025 •
edited
Loading

will work on this.

i'll give this a bit of time, and wait until #361 got merged,
so i can use the newly added structures from there.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@jkowalleck jkowalleck

Labels
Ecma
Projects
Core PURL spec
Status: In Progress
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@jkowalleck @johnmhoran