You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When the command "vise vs -t band" is entered, to my knowlege, the following message will be displayed:
INFO: Numbers of kpoints are incremented to be even numbers.
What is the effect/reason of this treatment?
Would it be a problem to rewrite non-zero-weighted k points created in a vise command with those written in a IBZKPT file in a previous SCF calculation?
In my calculations, band-structure caluculations are performed self-consistently;
a WAVECAR file converged in a previous run is read, and an ICHARG tag is NOT set.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is mainly because it is often better to use an even number of k-points (e.g. NKRED=2). However, for band structure calculations, this is not necessary.
To perform hybrid functional calculations, we need to use the KPOINTS file that the software generates. However, when using GGA(+U), we can utilize fixed charge density and run non-selfconsistent calculations using ICHARG=11. In that case, as you mentioned, you should modify the parameters accordingly.
I have understood the content. I had an interest on why the even-number k points are imposed in the case of band structure calculations (vise vs -t band).
I have an additional question to evaluate band structures.
I have done band structure calculations on collinear antiferromagnetic systems with the GGA-PBEsol functional.
All calculations have been done self consistently; so, ICHARG tags are NOT set to be 11.
In the case of MF2 (M = Mn, Co, etc.), the experimental XRD-derived space group is P4_2/mnm (tP lattice); meanwhile, antiferromagnetic primitive cells belong to Cmmm (oS lattice).
When KPOINTS files are created by the command "vise vs -t band" (by the SeeK-path rule), which Bravais lattice should be applied?
For example, the following warning is displayed when Cmmm is applied:
warnings.warn("oC lattice, but a almost equal to b", EdgeCaseWarning)
As a side note, to impose antiferromagnetic Cmmm, other "false" elements were intentionally included in POSCAR files only in the commands "vise vs" and "vise vs -t band"; for example, a Co2F4 POSCAR file was modified into a CoFeF4 where Fe played a role in "false" down-spin Co, and after entering the above commands, Fe was manually written into Co to get a "true" Co2F4 POSCAR file.
When the command "vise vs -t band" is entered, to my knowlege, the following message will be displayed:
INFO: Numbers of kpoints are incremented to be even numbers.
What is the effect/reason of this treatment?
Would it be a problem to rewrite non-zero-weighted k points created in a vise command with those written in a IBZKPT file in a previous SCF calculation?
In my calculations, band-structure caluculations are performed self-consistently;
a WAVECAR file converged in a previous run is read, and an ICHARG tag is NOT set.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: