Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

KPOINTS files for band-structure calculations #15

Open
FPrith opened this issue May 8, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

KPOINTS files for band-structure calculations #15

FPrith opened this issue May 8, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@FPrith
Copy link

FPrith commented May 8, 2023

When the command "vise vs -t band" is entered, to my knowlege, the following message will be displayed:
INFO: Numbers of kpoints are incremented to be even numbers.

  1. What is the effect/reason of this treatment?

  2. Would it be a problem to rewrite non-zero-weighted k points created in a vise command with those written in a IBZKPT file in a previous SCF calculation?
    In my calculations, band-structure caluculations are performed self-consistently;
    a WAVECAR file converged in a previous run is read, and an ICHARG tag is NOT set.

@yuuukuma
Copy link
Collaborator

  1. This is mainly because it is often better to use an even number of k-points (e.g. NKRED=2). However, for band structure calculations, this is not necessary.
  2. To perform hybrid functional calculations, we need to use the KPOINTS file that the software generates. However, when using GGA(+U), we can utilize fixed charge density and run non-selfconsistent calculations using ICHARG=11. In that case, as you mentioned, you should modify the parameters accordingly.

@FPrith
Copy link
Author

FPrith commented May 18, 2023

Thank you for your reply.

  1. I have understood the content. I had an interest on why the even-number k points are imposed in the case of band structure calculations (vise vs -t band).

  2. I have an additional question to evaluate band structures.

I have done band structure calculations on collinear antiferromagnetic systems with the GGA-PBEsol functional.
All calculations have been done self consistently; so, ICHARG tags are NOT set to be 11.

In the case of MF2 (M = Mn, Co, etc.), the experimental XRD-derived space group is P4_2/mnm (tP lattice); meanwhile, antiferromagnetic primitive cells belong to Cmmm (oS lattice).
When KPOINTS files are created by the command "vise vs -t band" (by the SeeK-path rule), which Bravais lattice should be applied?
For example, the following warning is displayed when Cmmm is applied:
warnings.warn("oC lattice, but a almost equal to b", EdgeCaseWarning)

As a side note, to impose antiferromagnetic Cmmm, other "false" elements were intentionally included in POSCAR files only in the commands "vise vs" and "vise vs -t band"; for example, a Co2F4 POSCAR file was modified into a CoFeF4 where Fe played a role in "false" down-spin Co, and after entering the above commands, Fe was manually written into Co to get a "true" Co2F4 POSCAR file.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants